Television twists are often hyped, debated, and sometimes forgotten. But in 2016, HBO’s Westworld delivered a narrative shock that reshaped the show’s meaning and elevated it into one of the decade’s most complex sci-fi dramas. From the beginning, the series asked questions about consciousness and morality, but few viewers suspected that the story’s most sympathetic newcomer and its most feared villain were the same man.
This revelation — the merging of William and the Man in Black across multiple timelines — was not only a bold structural gambit but a profound thematic shift. It recontextualized every earlier episode and challenged audiences to rethink their assumptions about identity, agency, and villainy.
The twist landed because of the careful narrative engineering across Season 1: nonlinear editing, parallel timelines, and character arcs that concealed the transformation taking place in plain sight. What emerged was one of HBO’s most ambitious storytelling maneuvers, comparable in scale and impact to shifts seen in Game of Thrones or Lost.
How HBO Used Narrative Structure to Stage Its Most Shocking Sci-Fi Reveal?
HBO’s adaptation of Michael Crichton’s 1973 film was already a high-budget, high-concept project. But the network’s creative strategy focused not only on spectacle — android hosts, sweeping western landscapes, and cinematic action — but on the narrative puzzle at its core.
The Man in Black, played by Ed Harris, seemed at first to mirror Yul Brynner’s relentless android gunslinger from the original film. However, the series subverted expectations. Instead of a rogue machine, he was revealed to be a man: a longtime park visitor obsessed with solving its deepest riddle.
Meanwhile, William (Jimmi Simpson) entered the story as the polar opposite — gentle, observant, and empathetic toward Dolores (Evan Rachel Wood). His arc followed a familiar heroic template until Season 1’s finale revealed the truth: William was the Man in Black, decades earlier, long before heartbreak, disillusionment, and nihilism reshaped him.
Media scholar Dr Alicia Benton, who studies nonlinear narrative formats, calls the twist “a masterclass in misdirection.”
“Westworld didn’t hide the truth,” she explains. “It hid the context. Once the episodes are viewed with the correct timeline in mind, the entire season locks into place.”
Character Construction and Ethical Ambiguity in the William/Man in Black Arc
The brilliance of the twist comes from character design. Early on, William appeared morally grounded compared to the park’s typical wealthy guests, who indulged in brutality and exploitation. Logan (Ben Barnes) embodied that darker impulse, while William resisted it — or seemed to.
But Westworld’s ethical inquiry runs deeper. The park amplified visitors’ true selves. William’s growing confidence, initially a positive change, transformed into possessiveness and rage when he realized Dolores could be reset endlessly and would forget him. When she did not remember their moments together, William spiraled, concluding that nothing in the park — or anywhere — mattered.
Actor Jimmi Simpson crafted a William who was likable, uncertain, and empathetic, making the transformation difficult to predict. Yet within the nonlinear structure, the pieces were there all along.
William’s Transformation from Guest to Villain
| Phase | Character Traits | Key Actions | Narrative Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early William | Gentle, cautious, morally upright | Protects Dolores, resists violence | Creates emotional investment in a “hero” |
| Middle Arc | Conflicted, self-actualizing | Rejects Logan’s worldview | Signals internal shift |
| Late Arc | Bitter, possessive, nihilistic | Accepts park violence, seeks meaning in power | Seeds for Man in Black identity |
| Man in Black | Hardened, ruthless, obsessed | Pursues maze, challenges park systems | Reveals the cycle of violence and identity |

Why the Twist Works: A Structural Breakdown of Season 1?
Nonlinear Timelines
Scenes were intercut without explicit markers, allowing separate timelines to appear simultaneous.
Character Memory and Host Reboots
Hosts, especially Dolores, blended memories of William with her present-day encounters with the Man in Black.
Parallel Mysteries
Other major twists — such as Bernard’s true identity as a host version of Arnold — distracted viewers from deeper questions.
Perspective Limitation
Dolores’ inability to distinguish memory from present created the same disorientation for viewers.
TV critic Mara Levinson describes Season 1’s structure as “a narrative labyrinth designed to reward careful viewers without ever confirming suspicion too early.”
Narrative Techniques Supporting the Reveal
| Technique | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Fragmented timelines | Conceal identity overlap | William scenes separated from Man in Black scenes |
| Host memory distortion | Blur past and present | Dolores recalling William while with Man in Black |
| Character misdirection | Direct focus elsewhere | Bernard’s revelation overshadowing timeline clues |
| Emotional investment | Heighten shock | William framed as a gentle romantic lead |
The Emotional and Performative Power of the Reveal
In the Season 1 finale, “The Bicameral Mind,” the truth unfolds through Dolores’ perspective. Her realization mirrors the viewer’s shock: the man she loved and the man she fears are one person, decades apart.
Evan Rachel Wood’s performance shifts between tenderness, confusion, and horror, grounding the twist in emotional reality rather than spectacle.
Ed Harris brings nuanced pain to the Man in Black, suggesting remnants of William’s love for Dolores still linger, buried under cynicism.
This dual performance — across two actors — gave depth to the reveal that few genre shows have achieved.
How the Twist Deepened the Series in Subsequent Seasons?
The revelation didn’t function merely as surprise; it redefined the series’ moral axis. In Season 2, viewers saw more of Simpson’s William as he manipulated his father-in-law (Peter Mullan) into a simulated reality, further illustrating his descent.
Later seasons explored:
- His fractured relationship with his daughter Grace
- His obsession with solving the park’s ultimate riddles
- His philosophical fixation on free will versus programming
While Westworld ended prematurely in Season 4, William’s arc remains one of the most complete — and haunting — villain origin stories in modern prestige TV.
Conclusion
The Man in Black/William twist stands as one of HBO’s most ambitious narrative gambles — a reveal that didn’t rely on shock value alone but on a meticulously crafted, emotionally grounded transformation. It changed the way viewers understood the series, reframed the show’s larger philosophical themes, and elevated Westworld from a standard sci-fi thriller into a meditative exploration of identity.
In an era defined by plot-driven surprises, Westworld delivered something rarer: a twist that deepened the story, justified a rewatch, and left a permanent mark on genre television.
FAQs
Yes. The Season 1 finale solidifies the reveal through edited flashbacks and Dolores’ recognition.
Showrunners have stated the identity reveal was part of the initial design for Season 1.
A re-watch reveals extensive foreshadowing that is difficult to catch on first viewing.
No — it reframes it, showing how environment, freedom, and disillusionment shaped him.
Yes. The nonlinear structure is central to the misdirection.